Amazing Pendulum-should koonami release this card?

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Amazing_Pendulum

This card although it seems broken, is balanced since in order to activate this card, 2 or more pendulum monsters must be in the extra deck.

Any Thoughts?

I don't think the card's that broken. I mean, kinda similar to Pot of Riches, though I'd argue and say Pot of Riches is better. I think it would be fair to make.

Don't play pend but the card seems broke helps u in late game if your scale has been destroyed also helps plays if used wavering eyes

Suck a broke card, if you were to play this late game when you had like 7 or 8 pendulum monsters in your extra, it could be a win condition in itself. I think it would get banned pretty quickly.

When I first saw this card I thought it was bad (come at me!), but now that I look at it again it's a very good card. I'd like to see this in play but with a restriction of some sorts. Maybe like you cannot conduct your BP and take 2k dmg? Something like POD (no ss) or Vanities (Can die if any card from deck or field goes to grave and you can't ss either).

P.s. When I gave my example it was just an example.

Imagine this, htye put two cards in their Pendulum Zone, use wavering eyes, then they use this card and add them back to the hand. It's pretty broke with no cost to pay.

I did state that they should have a restriction... Learn2Read

And I never said otherwise, learn2read.

Anyway, add a cost of discarding a card, or paying some lp and it shouldn't be too bad, when they bust it out late game as a top deck with low lp and low cards

Yes, but I don't understand why you'd state the most obvious play, that anyone who plays the game at a semi-compeititive level, would know from reading the card. It's pretty obvious that you were indirectly replying to me.

Well, back onto the topic. Discarding isn't a big cost, excluding if you broken up busted and don't want to give anything up. However if you're in that position, you're going to win most likely. Imo discarding isn't a big cost, even tributing isn't a big cost. The only way to really make this good is to give the opponent an advnatage or safety for one turn. For example, you can add (up to) 2 cards and you're opponent draws for each card you take. (You also cannot enter BP the turn you use this card.) Or instead of BP, it's you cannot special summon during this turn.

P.s. The reason I put up to is that I don't know if up to would really be a good thing, as you could choose but yeah...

The Troller wrote:

Yes, but I don't understand why you'd state the most obvious play, that anyone who plays the game at  a semi-compeititive level, would know from reading the card. It's pretty obvious that you were indirectly replying to me.

Well, back onto the topic. Discarding isn't a big cost, excluding if you broken up busted and don't want to give anything up. However if you're in that position, you're going to win most likely. Imo discarding isn't a big cost, even tributing isn't a big cost. The only way to really make this good is to give the opponent an advnatage or safety for one turn. For example, you can add (up to) 2 cards and you're opponent draws for each card you take. (You also cannot enter BP the turn you use this card.) Or instead of BP, it's you cannot special summon during this turn.

P.s. The reason I put up to is that I don't know if up to would really be a good thing, as you could choose but yeah...

I was elaborating on my previous point, which was actually directed towards Phantom, who thinks they should release this card. At least to my understand that's what he wants.

Discarding can be a big cost if it's a Pendulum monster, or something you don't want to discard, but the main idea of discarding is so that when you active this card, you don't plus. You activate this card by discarding a card, to add two cards, so you don't gin card advantage, you still have the same amount of cards as before, which is why I figured that discarding would make this a great card, but not too overpowered.

Eh, discarding is the cost for pendulum call. Is it a bad card? It's basically the same cept it's mag and from deck. Discarding wouldn't hinder the player at all. It's 1 card.... Compare that to no ss or BP. You can't get otked then.

I really don't think it needs a cost, it requires 2 pendulum monsters to be in the extra deck first.

Do you realise how broken this would be lategame? There's gonna be like 5-8 pl in there at least. You can get any cards you want. It's basically a free pl scale, not to mention that it doesn't say you can't ns that turn.

Stopping you from plussing makes it a not so good version of Pendulum Call, so I think a discard effect would balance the card.

Phantom with out a cost, this card can be a lethal top deck.

Eh I don't see it. Discarding juggler, discarding useless shit late game. It's a free pl scale mid-late game. Even early games sometimes in magicians.

Well it's like, it's not as good as Pendulum Call it will only give you whats in your extra deck instead of being able to search your deck for whatever you want, and with this cost of discarding it, it will make the card relevant, but stop you from plussing and being broken.

how is that balanced ever heard of wavering eyes or dracoslayer lol?

It's equal to pend call. Pend call is only for magicians. SPECIFIC TO ONE ARCHTYPE. This card works for any arctype and mid-lategame is a free otk.

Plus with wavering, dracoslayer etc it's so fucking broken.

Exactly what troller said lol

hmmm, troller does raise a good point, imagine this in qliphorts 0_0

Exactly. It's a scout searcher for whenever it dies. Usually you'd have to go for the trap, now you don't.

did you seriously just O.o qliphorts seriously way more broken things you could of gone with and you went with qlis lol

sorry for that double forum spams

Eh, it's just an example. Plus it can search scout, any card you need that's in extra or mono. It basically cancels out Scout's weakeness, well excluding if it gets banished.

No problem Alchemist, I already deleted it