Let me Do this part by part,
- Prometheus9366 wrote:
- Ok so my problems. Your ruberic is very bias
- Prometheus9366 wrote:
- -attitude: i lost points cause i didnt talk? like really?
"It was meh.. Average in my opinion. There wasn't a conversation, just the occasional "lol" at my inability to draw into anything important"
Attitude is an important part of the
test,hes up to the tester to determine how the testee is,and to measure his attitude,but after seeing this,he was obviously being 2 good with you,i personally would have gave you an 4(top)
- Prometheus9366 wrote:
- -build: hahaha really. you dislike my build so i lose points. doesnt seem very bias (sarcasm). cause i use a 45 card build, and i dont have search. if you looked at my build i have plenty of search. just cause i dont use 3 onslaught cause its my preference i lose points. wow.
Is not that he dislikes your build,its that the build is bad,giving a score to the deck is a part of the
test,and they are 2 main aspects to it:Consistency a 45 card deck has already -5 on that only?You know why?ITs called probablity,the chances of drawing a card that is played at 3 40 cards in your deck is 7,5%,with 45 is 6,6 %=less chances of topdecking a card that could help you,even with a 40 card deck the consistency is a hard aspect, the usual problemis drawing a hand with only s/t or only monsters,thats why the ratio of traps,spells and monsters have to be taken in consideration while making and grading the deck,cards like duality or upstart are used to increase the consistency of the deck,because they are basically a tool to thin your deck to increase the chacnes of drawing a necesary card later on,the searchers are a key part of this aspect,not only they make the deck thiner but they also add something to your hand(usually a monster)so its a deck thiner and a proxy card,dat in some cases(like fire kings) can act like several cards,tenki for example is able to search almost every main card of your deck,gives you bear/gorilla,yashka ,wolfbark etc etc,there is an old said on ygo,if you want to kill a deck,hit the searcher.Plenty is not enough,what the tester is telling you are not only the scores are tips and guidelines for you to take and edit your deck,because he knows more about your deck than you do and knows more about the metagame and how it should be played to give it a chance to compete agains the current decks,Onslaught at 3 is a must in fire kings,its the card to get garunix its the card that starts the combos,is the card that everyone hates,he was right,it might be your personal preference but that dosnt makes it any better or gives it more chances of winning.
- Prometheus9366 wrote:
- -skill: so we played 3 games.
(game 0)
I lost points cause i dc the first one on turn 3 and automatically i lose points cause he would have won. really? ok so i warned you i may dc cause my crome was being shitty. like if it was 15 turns in id understand but it was turn 3.
game
Its not about who would win,if u check the
test is not about winning or losing,is about skill,u could have done stuff,u could have stoped his combos or at least do something,u showed no skill,so you dont get pints for this game.
- Prometheus9366 wrote:
- (game 1)
because i get good draws and i chose not to over extend i lose points? there yah go again bein' bias. i lost points due to my opponent not drawing what they needed. that isnt my problem that is his problem not having a consistent deck.
Read the comments again,is not because u chose to not over extend,its BEACUSE you over extended,you had the otk early on the game,and yet you missplayed and took wrong choices giving your oppopent several turns to come up with a counter play to reverse the situation,the fact that it didnt happened was luck nothing else,if something you showed lack of skill.
- Prometheus9366 wrote:
- (game 2)
again i get judged on having good consistency and you not having good consistency. seems bias again. so yeah.
You see,his deck is not there to win,is there to
test you and your skill,and the fact that even tough his main card against you (while having 7 copies of it)should give you a free win,yet u strugled,and had to wait over 10 turns to gain the field advantage.Skill demostration?=Poor
- Prometheus9366 wrote:
- (my siding) i care less about this. i didnt side much cause i saw you deck sucked with consistency and wasnt to worried. But again your bias about that. Its mostly a matter of opinion.
Its not a matter of oppinion,there is a range within whats acceptable for a side,every single side deck is different,every single side deck is personal,however,they are several guidelines to follow when you are siding,saying that you didnt sided because u saw that the deck was bad only proves how naive you are,underestimating a deck is the worst thing you could do,a player should be able to detect the general playstyle of the deck and then side acordingly to what he saw,you knew that the deck was a fusion based deck,and yet u left the best card to stop it out.So you should be penalized for that,
- Prometheus9366 wrote:
-misplays/corrections: i didnt have any misplays... and your correction was that i otk faster. You had set cards and i didnt want to over extend so i lose points for that. Seems a bit unfair for that.
You see,playing is not about knowing how to use your cards,but knowing how to stop your opponent,a field advatage is secured when you have cards to stop you oppoenet from making any play that might hurt you,you won in the end,but what you did was a missplay,because the best play would have been shutting down his deck.
- Prometheus9366 wrote:
- I dont think your guys ruberic is very .... fair or such. My main complaint is that i think that the results are unfair because of the fact that i didnt win faster, and because you had consistency problems, as well as what i mentioned before.
THe rubric is fine,is fair,and so far no member has had any trouble with it,its not about winning,is about skill,if you showed no skill then your score will be low,if you had a good play but instead you did a mediocre one,then your score will be low,if you didnt used your cards to his fullest then your score will be low,if you are a bad duelist,you score will be low.Its not on the testr nor the rubric,any tester of the academy would have given you similar scores.
- Prometheus9366 wrote:
- id appreciate if another admin talked to me about this
Anything else?I could retest you if you want,but dont expect me to go easy on you after what u have said about the tester and the testee,if you are so convinced that you deserve more,i will
test you,prove me that you are better than your score,destroy me,show no mercy.I will be waiting for ur PM.
