take that meta... with your 12 card advantage lol. (gol'gar synchro aliens)

He maxx c'd me twice for 4 cards, shared rided me twice for 1 card.  should have gone for the second king of the feral imps search for alien ammonite, not once did i even get gol'gal out.  

https://i.imgur.com/aZq7mwc.png

https://i.imgur.com/dKYKaYe.png

https://i.imgur.com/4Hv0r4p.png

https://i.imgur.com/zGWqFBH.png

And then non meta...

https://i.imgur.com/IR1wSYt.png

https://i.imgur.com/hH4kWrE.png

https://i.imgur.com/uZw1DaX.png

holden on to the cliff! ended up loosing.

https://i.imgur.com/NEZ7elF.png
https://i.imgur.com/n6uIuHS.png

spell fragrance is good, but i wonder if its a hand clogger. Magical planter i might pull off once in a game, most of the time its fodder for monk. Other monsters that might be good, atm i hardly use the alien effs (except gol'gar), they are more just synchro and xyz material. I was using alien kid with one Mysterious Triangle, but i just ended up taking that out.

what you guys think?

https://i.imgur.com/AalmmnJ.png

peaceflowers wrote:

holden on to the cliff! ended up loosing.

https://i.imgur.com/NEZ7elF.png
https://i.imgur.com/n6uIuHS.png

spell fragrance is good, but i wonder if its a hand clogger.   Magical planter i might pull off once in a game, most of the time its fodder for monk.  Other monsters that might be good, atm i hardly use the alien effs (except gol'gar), they are more just synchro and xyz material.  I was using alien kid with one Mysterious Triangle, but i just ended up taking that out.  

what you guys think?

https://i.imgur.com/AalmmnJ.png

Before I respond to the actual topic, I should probably let you know that double posting is against the rules, and if you check the rules it could result in a warning. I just wanted to let you know, so that you knew.

As for your deck, I would not main deck Anti-Spell Fragrance. To me, that card is a side deck card, and shouldn't be main decked. If you put that in your side, it leaves you more room to run something more useful. Maybe it would give you room for Bottomless Trap Hole and Ring of Destruction? Bottomless is a great card for going up against Qliphorts. They Pendulum Summon 3 Pendulum Monsters, you can bottomless and banish all 3 of them. I just think switching your Anti-Spell Fragrance out for your Bottomless Trap Hole and Ring of Destruction, would probably work out a bit better for you. Have fun with it though.

good idea, in regards to qliphorts, spell fragrance would actually be a great card as you cant set a monster in the pen zones it would prevent them from pen summoning altogether, but i see your point, wouldnt do much against infornoids. So side decking it.

peaceflowers wrote:

good idea, in regards to qliphorts, spell fragrance would actually be a great card as you cant set a monster in the pen zones it would prevent them from pen summoning altogether, but i see your point, wouldnt do much against infornoids.  So side decking it.

Nice, glad I could be of help!

peaceflowers wrote:

good idea, in regards to qliphorts, spell fragrance would actually be a great card as you cant set a monster in the pen zones it would prevent them from pen summoning altogether, but i see your point, wouldnt do much against infornoids.  So side decking it.

You actually can set monsters in the pen zones. This was ruled quite a while ago.

oh, maybe it was an old page that I read that on, it was from that forum group that usually is pretty professional about rulings. Can you set any monster in the pen zones? Or do they have to be pen monsters. I'm trying to think of an example, like goblin zombie or something and hit it with mst to use his field to graveyard eff?

peaceflowers wrote:

oh, maybe it was an old page that I read that on, it was from that forum group that usually is pretty professional about rulings.  Can you set any monster in the pen zones?  Or do they have to be pen monsters.  I'm trying to think of an example, like goblin zombie or something and hit it with mst to use his field to graveyard eff?  

The monsters have to be pendulum monsters.

lol I was so wrong with what I said, I didn't even read what I was saying. I meant to say you could activate them in the pendulum zone still, but that too I think is wrong. Sorry. Guess that's what happens when you don't play this game for months.

EDIT: so the term stating that they can't be activated as spell cards was where the confusion was on my part. I was wondering if they were automatically treated as being activated as spell cards when placed in the zone, or if the activation of the effect was what it prevented.

In other words, I'm very rusty and don't know where that sense of logic came from. I also never ran into the problem against anti-spell fragrance when I used pendulums so I guess that also comes into play, not properly knowing what to do. Apologies.