| The banlist | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
(RPFC) Shiki Ra Yellow
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Losses : 1 Posts : 1490 Reputation : 2 Join date : 2014-02-10 Location : .
| Subject: The banlist Sun Oct 12, 2014 11:55 am | |
| The bnlist snt ok here. It has to be updated . The one in the test rubrik allows all deckks except alternative win, deck destruction, Burn
That is all that is banned nothing else. I say we need a sticky or the rubrik ha to be updatesd with a lsit of decks/cards that are not allowed to be used in the test.
All meta isallowed for example.
I say we need a better banlist or atleast onte that is maby more clear what we allow and what not. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: The banlist Sun Oct 12, 2014 11:58 am | |
| What's wrong with the current testing banlist? It covers everything that needs to be covered, unless we plan on banning things in particular, then we don't need to edit it.
Banned decks: alternative win, burn, troll deck, deck destruction, Additional note: Do not use otk decks as it may hurt your skill score... in order for the testers to assess your skill the duel needs to last long. |
|
| |
(RPFC) Shiki Ra Yellow
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Losses : 1 Posts : 1490 Reputation : 2 Join date : 2014-02-10 Location : .
| Subject: Re: The banlist Sun Oct 12, 2014 12:00 pm | |
| It was just a idea maby. Because of all th emeta and stuff mabt those were not allowed eather. But if this is all then i gues it is oky | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: The banlist Sun Oct 12, 2014 12:02 pm | |
| Well, unless it gets listed, META is allowed to be used in the test. |
|
| |
RustyGloves Shadow Duelist
Immune to warnings? : Yes Warnings : Posts : 385 Reputation : 7 Join date : 2014-02-13 Age : 28
| Subject: Re: The banlist Sun Oct 12, 2014 4:42 pm | |
| There is a reason we won't be banning meta. Unlike the other decks that are banned, meta is played for the idea that it advances one's skills/chances of winning. While you can perfectly argue that the other decks do advance chances of winning, these decks don't require skill to play (hence the term "solitaire": You draw cards and play cards. You don't use intricate combos in these decks). Therefore, where you can say that some meta is "unfair", it isn't unbeatable and all meta require at least some form of thinking to get it going. | |
|
| |
CryonixHeat™ CryonixHeat
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Posts : 55 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2014-01-31
| Subject: Re: The banlist Sun Oct 12, 2014 7:00 pm | |
| I, unlike the masses, think SatellarKnights take some skill to use, and are one of the least autopilot decks. | |
|
| |
patrick1324 Ra Yellow
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Posts : 794 Reputation : 6 Join date : 2014-02-25
| Subject: Re: The banlist Mon Oct 13, 2014 12:01 am | |
| well, if a underrated deck can defeat meta this mean that underrated deck user's skill is stronger than meta deck user, testing rubric changed, the skill is more important now, win or lose only affect 5 marks.
so dont worry about if testee use underrated deck you will lose 0-2 to a tester that use meta and become a silfer, what the tester want to know is your skill. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: The banlist Mon Oct 13, 2014 12:49 am | |
| - CryonixHeat™ wrote:
- I, unlike the masses, think SatellarKnights take some skill to use, and are one of the least autopilot decks.
that very commemt just made your opinion invalid kk thank bye |
|
| |
KidChaos
Immune to warnings? : No Posts : 91 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2014-10-04
| Subject: Re: The banlist Mon Oct 13, 2014 4:09 am | |
| - Kalin Kessler wrote:
- CryonixHeat™ wrote:
- I, unlike the masses, think SatellarKnights take some skill to use, and are one of the least autopilot decks.
that very commemt just made your opinion invalid kk thank bye well he has a small but futile point out of tier 1 satellas take the most skill but yea they are still pretty autopilot unless u run a more rogue build | |
|
| |
PoinTy
Immune to warnings? : No Posts : 24 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2014-10-13
| Subject: Re: The banlist Mon Oct 13, 2014 8:21 am | |
| | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: The banlist | |
| |
|
| |
| The banlist | |
|