Runzy test's results

Deck - Tester : Spirits hands
         Testee : Scraps cosmic dragons(Yang zing)


Attitude -7/10
Kinda nice guy.but he kinda got mad when he was losing and got bad draws.

Deck Build - 18/25
Nice deck but can't beat spirits.

11 for competitveness 7 for synergy

Skill - 13/25
Side isn't that good and yea i full controlled him game 1 and game 3 he is kinda weak against vanity bottomless and without his field he can't do much so i suggest him trap stun and 1 more terraforming
4 for control of duel,4 for siding and side deck,5for general skill or nice moves


Ruling knowledge - 0/10

incompleated

Misplays and Corrections - 8/10: He Did some mistakes

Result of Duel - 10/20:

Total: 56/100
Don't be too harsh or too easy on them on each of the above methods of testing.


Slifer Red 0-69<--- here
Ra Yellow 70-89
Obelisk Blue 90-100
gl next time

Nice work.

kk x.x

Aaaah, eve with the completed ruling results, you won't make Ra, but you seem like a nice enough guy, and I can imagine you will make Ra eventually.

meh good luck next time anyway :3

*Judgment Dragon* wrote:

Aaaah, eve with the completed ruling results, you won't make Ra, but you seem like a nice enough guy, and I can imagine you will make Ra eventually.

i was ra x.x

L Lawliet wrote:

Deck - Tester : Spirits hands
         Testee : Spirits cosmic dragons(Yang zing)


Attitude -7/10
Kinda nice guy.but he kinda got mad when he was losing and got bad draws.

Deck Build - 18/25
Nice deck but can't beat spirits.

11 for competitveness 7 for synergy

Skill - 13/25
Side isn't that good and yea i full controlled him game 1 and game 3 he is kinda weak against vanity bottomless and without his field he can't do much so i suggest him trap stun and 1 more terraforming
4 for control of duel,4 for siding and side deck,5for general skill or nice moves


Ruling knowledge - 0/10

incompleated

Misplays and Corrections - 8/10: He Did some mistakes

Result of Duel - 10/20:

Total: 56/100
Don't be too harsh or too easy on them on each of the above methods of testing.


Slifer Red 0-69<--- here
Ra Yellow 70-89
Obelisk Blue 90-100
gl next time

your reasons to some of you scores are bad. Judging my build 18 just because i didn't beat spirit is bad. Also weak against vanity? you used vanity and i won g2. As a new tester you really gotta work on your reasons. You can't just judge a deck build over not being able to beat "spirits" i actually see no point to that.
Make them detailed like this [Only admins are allowed to see this link] Mark them down for good reasons. Not Just Because they could beat "this" or "that"

L Lawliet wrote:

Deck - Tester : Spirits hands
         Testee : Spirits cosmic dragons(Yang zing)


Attitude -7/10
Kinda nice guy.but he kinda got mad when he was losing and got bad draws. thats what we call salt.... everyone has that, aslong it is not toward you as tester it doesnt give it a bad attitude.

Deck Build - 18/25
Nice deck but can't beat spirits. most dump reason ever...... like lets say Dragunity rulers from sept 2013, Nice deck but cant beat banish based decks :3 .... cmon dude -.- like how many spirit player you see around and those reasions are most stupid ones. every deck got it bad matchup. like stellars, nice deck but cant beat dolls, BA nice deck but cant beat stellars, dolls, nice deck but cant beat BA -.-. this is not a valid reason for deducting points.

11 for competitveness 7 for synergy

Skill - 13/25
Side isn't that good and yea i full controlled him game 1 and game 3 he is kinda weak against vanity bottomless and without his field he can't do much so i suggest him trap stun and 1 more terraforming
4 for control of duel,4 for siding and side deck,5for general skill or nice moves


Ruling knowledge - 0/10

incompleated

Misplays and Corrections - 8/10: He Did some mistakes

Result of Duel - 10/20:

Total: 56/100
Don't be too harsh or too easy on them on each of the above methods of testing.


Slifer Red 0-69<--- here
Ra Yellow 70-89
Obelisk Blue 90-100
gl next time

....

Runzy wrote:

*Judgment Dragon* wrote:

Aaaah, eve with the completed ruling results, you won't make Ra, but you seem like a nice enough guy, and I can imagine you will make Ra eventually.

i was ra x.x

Fair enough, I didn't know.. as far as I'm aware you joined and got promoted straight to Mod..

bayar can u explain me why u can't explain then

L Lawliet wrote:

bayar can u explain me why u can't explain then

That grummur.

ya i suck

L Lawliet wrote:

Deck Build - 18/25
Nice deck but can't beat spirits.

11 for competitveness 7 for synergy

So...Is this the only thing you're going with? I wasn't being serious about the deck build being explained like this.

Denied. Please Lawliet, you need to put more effort with your scores.

So Runzy isn't Slifer anymore?

Runzy wrote:

your reasons to some of you scores are bad. Judging my build 18 just because i didn't beat spirit is bad. Also weak against vanity? you used vanity and i won g2. As a new tester you really gotta work on your reasons. You can't just judge a deck build over not being able to beat "spirits" i actually see no point to that.
Make them detailed like this [Only admins are allowed to see this link] Mark them down for good reasons. Not Just Because they could beat "this" or "that"

I love how my test was the one that got chosen as an example I should definitely be head testee

I ha d another re-test with bayar now am broke

Noob