| Rulings section (should we do it?) | |
|
|
Should we do it? | yes | | 92% | [ 11 ] | no | | 8% | [ 1 ] | im biased | | 0% | [ 0 ] |
| Total Votes : 12 | | Poll closed |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:19 pm | |
| A section where people can ask about rulings for certain cards. |
|
| |
Hero Assistant
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Losses : 1 Wins : 3 Posts : 2958 Reputation : 3 Join date : 2014-02-06
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:21 pm | |
| Don't we have teacher's,for that? | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:21 pm | |
| yes but we only have 1 teacher... |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:29 pm | |
| I have this on my academy that I'm making and I think it's a great Idea so yeah. |
|
| |
PLivingston Obelisk Blue
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Posts : 185 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2014-05-08
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:35 pm | |
| - Phantom wrote:
- yes but we only have 1 teacher...
How desperate are you for teachers? | |
|
| |
INUZIRO Obelisk Blue
Immune to warnings? : Yes Warnings : Losses : 0 Wins : 2 Posts : 923 Reputation : 3 Join date : 2014-01-24 Age : 32 Location : NYC
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sat Aug 23, 2014 6:35 pm | |
| definitely needed for a growing community like ours. but we must be able to digest the amount of ruling in a legitimate manner. also create a section for ruling requests and daily (small) ruling teachings. it should be active by all staff members. and perhaps even will assist in keeping our testers on their toes. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sat Aug 23, 2014 6:41 pm | |
| I think we need to look at DN Forums and take a similar system from there, as they have a working system with the ruling questions and stuff. |
|
| |
Shrek Founder
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Losses : 0 Wins : 1 Posts : 604 Reputation : -19 Join date : 2014-06-22
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sat Aug 23, 2014 7:00 pm | |
| http://forum.duelingnetwork.com/index.php?/user/54151-skulblaka98/ | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sat Aug 23, 2014 7:05 pm | |
| Posting links like that, doesn't mean anything. The point of this concept is that we have it on demand right here, for members of NA, so when they can't find a particular ruling online, which lets face it does happen a lot to members who aren't 100% on rulings, they can come here and post them, which brings the academy together to help members get better with their ruling knowledge. |
|
| |
Hero Assistant
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Losses : 1 Wins : 3 Posts : 2958 Reputation : 3 Join date : 2014-02-06
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sun Aug 24, 2014 1:17 am | |
| If we actually do this,will we need a ruling teacher? | |
|
| |
EbilKid V.I.P Member
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Losses : 0 Wins : 4 Posts : 720 Reputation : 3 Join date : 2014-08-07 Age : 26 Location : Cairo
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:52 am | |
| If we are gonna do such things, what is the use of teachers around this academy? | |
|
| |
patrick1324 Ra Yellow
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Posts : 794 Reputation : 6 Join date : 2014-02-25
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sun Aug 24, 2014 5:22 am | |
| i agree we need this 10000000000000000000000000000000% fully support this plan | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sun Aug 24, 2014 5:28 am | |
| - EbilKid wrote:
- If we are gonna do such things, what is the use of teachers around this academy?
Well, I think we should have it so anyone in the academy has a chance to answer the questions given in this academy, but as soon as a moderator/administrator finds the best answer, then they can lock the topic and give note on which one was the best answer. As for the teacher part, they can still give lessons on things as usual, seeing as most of the ruling questions will probably be things like, "Evolsaur Dolkka vs Grave Effect", or something along those lines, where it's just a ruling question between two cards. |
|
| |
Shrek Founder
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Losses : 0 Wins : 1 Posts : 604 Reputation : -19 Join date : 2014-06-22
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sun Aug 24, 2014 6:02 am | |
| oh so basically we are copying DNF's Ruling Section, Clever. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sun Aug 24, 2014 6:08 am | |
| we do dis i say we appoint a teacher like banner over it or even JD |
|
| |
Hero Assistant
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Losses : 1 Wins : 3 Posts : 2958 Reputation : 3 Join date : 2014-02-06
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sun Aug 24, 2014 6:52 am | |
| What if they don't want to be teachers? | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sun Aug 24, 2014 8:23 am | |
| - Drewzer44 wrote:
- oh so basically we are copying DNF's Ruling Section, Clever.
I'm not saying we are, I'm just giving my opinion on what we could do, but essentially, my idea is to use the a similar concept, yes. I think it is clever as it will benefit the academy. If you feel you have an idea, then please make a useful input as all you've been doing on this thread and the netdecking thread is making silly inputs. |
|
| |
Shrek Founder
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Losses : 0 Wins : 1 Posts : 604 Reputation : -19 Join date : 2014-06-22
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:12 am | |
| - *Judgment Dragon* wrote:
- Drewzer44 wrote:
- oh so basically we are copying DNF's Ruling Section, Clever.
all you've been doing on this thread and the netdecking thread is making silly inputs. No u | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:55 am | |
| rulings section approved, topic locked. |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Rulings section (should we do it?) | |
| |
|
| |
| Rulings section (should we do it?) | |
|