What do you guys think of Burgesstoma?

Well yeah. It seems like an interesting archtype, however rank 2s have always been neglected or side lined as an xyz. Also I don't really see the purpose of the deck, well I can but I don't see how it would work. There are 9 rank2 cards that burgesstoma can get out (doesn't count the burgesstoma xyz and doesn't count things that need a specific type like dark). So we count all of the rank 2s they can get out combined and it barely equals 15. This is when you run the burg xyzs at 3 and all the others at 1 btw. Also when will it become ocg or tcg? Or is it just... there?

This is so cool if they are so spammy i should try the socuteboss lock with em
also coons were OP for a while there so there ya go rank 2 xyz are kind of badass too

I faced them once, and all I can say is they are just annoying as hell. Like... if you could git annoying into a deck, it would be that... xD

nice trap monster deck, the tiki do not have any potential anymore but i think this deck may bring up the reputation of trap monster deck.

hehe royaal decree FTW, thats how i think about that **** deck, i dislike it

Royal decree doesn't stop it's trap spam. It negates the effect, but the card can still be activated and it still goes to grave. RD only negates traps on field, not in grave.

I think it is a very interesting deck and am sad the Tcg isnt getting it for a while .

I think they're very interesting.  I saw a video of a Burgestroma deck that made use of the fact that they aren't monsters.  Take a look at the VWXYZ Burgesstoma Dragon Cannon to see what I mean:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4kQk3zrqfY

@hazmah, maybe a dumb question but could you use dweller against it? don't think so?

Yes, I think so.