Testee: Noble Knights.
Tester: Shaddoll.
Attitude -10/10
Attitude wasn't a problem at all.
Deck Build - 11/25
Competitiveness: The deck looks like it might have potential but it doesn't look competitive in it's current state and didn't show itself to be competitive during any of the duels in the match.
Creativity: The deck looks a bit creative, it definitely doesn't look net decked.
Originality: It looks kind of original, not very original though.
5 for competitveness 3 for creativity, 3 for originality.
Skill - 3/25
Control of the duel: He had slight control in the second game for a turn, but I soon took it back and gained control.
Siding and side deck: He had 2 cards in his side deck, but they were just other options for his deck, nothing to side against any other deck, only 2 cards.
General skill or nice moves: He made a nice move, but didn't show much skill at all.
1 for control of duel, 0 for siding and side deck, 2 for general skill or nice moves
Ruling knowledge - ?/10
Awaiting results from their ruling test.
Misplays and Corrections - 7/10:
He didn't know my Midrash couldn't be destroyed by his card effects when I attacked and he used mirror force while it was the only face up monster on my side of the field. Equipped Queen to the wrong card and attempted to use the dark effect instead of the light effect while it was equipped to a Light monster.
Result of Duel - 0/20: (0/20 for winning no duels, 10/20 for losing 2-1, 15/20 for winning 2-1 and 20/20 for winning 2-0)
Total: 31/100
Well, you made slifer red, just awaiting on your ruling test results to come through so they can be added to your final score. Welcome to NA.
Slifer Red 0-59
Ra Yellow 60-89
Obelisk Blue 90-100
Banned decks: alternative win, burn, troll deck, deck destruction.
