| Should Charge be Banned? | |
|
+12xxbongsmoker patrick1324 Hisoka INUZIRO Jaguar101 TopGun (RPFC) Shiki Joshua Average Professor Banner Kalin Kessler Hero 16 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Should Charge be Banned? Sun May 25, 2014 12:09 pm | |
| Should soul charge be banned? |
|
| |
Hero Assistant
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Losses : 1 Wins : 3 Posts : 2958 Reputation : 3 Join date : 2014-02-06
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Sun May 25, 2014 12:12 pm | |
| Not really just limited,becausenot alot of people,play it at 3.Well,at least i don't. | |
|
| |
Kalin Kessler Founder
lost souls(darkshop currency) : 43 Immune to warnings? : Yes Warnings : Losses : 1 Posts : 787 Reputation : 14 Join date : 2014-01-02 Location : Hell
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Sun May 25, 2014 12:23 pm | |
| Of course it needs to get banned..The multiple SS is so broken.It should be and it will be banned | |
|
| |
Professor Banner Obelisk Blue
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Posts : 2410 Reputation : 2 Join date : 2014-01-03 Age : 26
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Sun May 25, 2014 12:39 pm | |
| it sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo should be bannnnnneeddddddd its so f***** up and so bloddy op it actually hurts D: (lol) | |
|
| |
Average Ra Yellow
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Posts : 819 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2014-03-03
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Sun May 25, 2014 12:48 pm | |
| As good as it is, I don't think so. Just limited. The fact you can't enter the battle phase and the large cost to summon is heavy. If you use it poorly, you're just going to screw yourself over. But yeah it's OP | |
|
| |
Joshua V.I.P Member
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Posts : 22 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2014-01-03
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Sun May 25, 2014 1:26 pm | |
| I don't really see any reason why. It only works in like 3 decks and those decks have done little post prio. | |
|
| |
Kalin Kessler Founder
lost souls(darkshop currency) : 43 Immune to warnings? : Yes Warnings : Losses : 1 Posts : 787 Reputation : 14 Join date : 2014-01-02 Location : Hell
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Sun May 25, 2014 2:15 pm | |
| the cost is not that huge...and josh it can fit to a lot of decks | |
|
| |
Average Ra Yellow
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Posts : 819 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2014-03-03
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Sun May 25, 2014 3:19 pm | |
| A majority of people pay 4-5000LP...that's a pretty huge chunk of your life Celes | |
|
| |
Joshua V.I.P Member
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Posts : 22 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2014-01-03
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Sun May 25, 2014 3:36 pm | |
| Let's see what current decks play soul charge at more than 1 in the meta: 1. Dragons 2. Infernity 3. Mermail
2 of those decks lose to themselves. Soul Charge is "semi-limitable" if you really think it's that bad. | |
|
| |
(RPFC) Shiki Ra Yellow
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Losses : 1 Posts : 1490 Reputation : 2 Join date : 2014-02-10 Location : .
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Sun May 25, 2014 4:50 pm | |
| joshua look what you are saying dragons ? do you know how many dragon decks there are hieratic bleu eyes rulers dragonunity and there are more i think so dont take thate too easy also i think it can be used in a gadget deck just pay 2000 or something and keep going nd you also dont have to pay 5000 you can summon less Its just OP and should be banned or atleast maby at 1 but 3 it too much and 2 also | |
|
| |
Joshua V.I.P Member
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Posts : 22 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2014-01-03
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Sun May 25, 2014 5:15 pm | |
| The reason Dragons, Mermail and Infernity can use Soul Charge is because they can set up unbreakable boards. Your example, gadgets, cannot. If Shock Master was legal, I would say ban this card instantly but it is not. If your plan is to Soul Charge 2 then I would not suggest playing multiply copies.
Also Dragons usually refers to Dragon Rulers. | |
|
| |
TopGun The King
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Losses : 1 Posts : 513 Reputation : 1 Join date : 2014-01-03 Age : 27 Location : South East Asia
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Sun May 25, 2014 5:31 pm | |
| I cant stand the card iv been sacked so hard by it so much so BAN IT | |
|
| |
Jaguar101 Shadow Duelist
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Posts : 768 Reputation : 2 Join date : 2014-01-03
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Sun May 25, 2014 8:20 pm | |
| I think limited to 1 make it top-deckable but that would be it. | |
|
| |
INUZIRO Obelisk Blue
Immune to warnings? : Yes Warnings : Losses : 0 Wins : 2 Posts : 923 Reputation : 3 Join date : 2014-01-24 Age : 32 Location : NYC
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Sun May 25, 2014 8:57 pm | |
| id say semi it. just to have people tech it instead of rely on it. | |
|
| |
Hisoka Tester
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Posts : 139 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2014-04-01
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Sun May 25, 2014 11:42 pm | |
| It`s gonna support pendulum, so if you know konami they will not bann it. It was like when they release the dragon ruler tin, they want money of that so they didnt hit dragon ruler that format to. Konami just want you to buy there new stuff, they dont want you to play old decks thats one fo the reason stratos is banned | |
|
| |
patrick1324 Ra Yellow
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Posts : 794 Reputation : 6 Join date : 2014-02-25
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Mon May 26, 2014 12:07 am | |
| well, he just created this card not more than 1 year them get banned?
i think will be limited. | |
|
| |
xxbongsmoker Darkness
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Posts : 1016 Reputation : 1 Join date : 2014-01-12 Age : 106 Location : Australia, Brisbane
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Mon May 26, 2014 12:38 am | |
| yeah limited to 1 I think. or maybe change effect a bit to make it less OP like you can only summon 2 monsters or something | |
|
| |
Kaiza
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Posts : 23 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2014-03-07 Age : 33 Location : Caribbean
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Mon May 26, 2014 8:49 am | |
| it should be at 1
for a super reborn, it has its drawbacks, and that has some effect on it. I can deal with soul charge once, anyone should be able to
but soul charge at multiples is ridiculous; its awful to stop the first soul charge with a solemn warning, then get hit by a next one on the very same turn. And while it has its drawbacks, the fact its a combo restarter has some merits. At 3, it becomes not just a combo restarter, but a consistent combo extender that becomes really awful to deal with back to back; there's only so much you can stop repeatedly | |
|
| |
Hero Assistant
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Losses : 1 Wins : 3 Posts : 2958 Reputation : 3 Join date : 2014-02-06
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Mon May 26, 2014 8:54 am | |
| Not really i think it should be at 2.Why?Because of the cost. | |
|
| |
hazmah Lord Garunix's Messenger
lost souls(darkshop currency) : 8 Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Losses : 5 Wins : 19 Posts : 1840 Reputation : 5 Join date : 2014-01-20
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Mon May 26, 2014 12:50 pm | |
| Jaden u cant say something could be at 2 cos of a cost.. Sixth sense has its mills, which can be bad in some decks, which is its backfall but its banned. I think the hardest they should hit it is limiting it. Reasons: Late game this card can screw u, you wont be able to otk = exciton next turn or big eye and remember u still take the 5000 if u go all in. No card is so OP that u cant get around it. | |
|
| |
KleiNoel
Immune to warnings? : Yes Warnings : Posts : 1560 Reputation : 5 Join date : 2014-01-03 Age : 26 Location : Tirana,Albania
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Mon May 26, 2014 3:02 pm | |
| yeah hazmah has right but soul charge should definately be limited, it is very good in decks that dont need to attack to win like infernitys they just set their combos and they can do otk also can be used in decks like bujins that spam too much, madolche too evilswarm so it can be used in every deck | |
|
| |
ventriloquist
Immune to warnings? : No Warnings : Posts : 23 Reputation : 0 Join date : 2014-05-18
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? Mon May 26, 2014 4:15 pm | |
| Ok so first let me say that...
Soul charge is good in EVERY DECK!
Now. Wether or not your deck should run 1,2 or 3 sort of depends on your preference and your deck. If you get beat by soul charge... That's the game. It happens. Losing is part of it. Make your defense better and prepare your deck for soul charge because a lot of players do indeed use it. You yourself should take advantage of the super reborn and play it as well. Don't be stupid and play it when you have no defense either. It's a very risky card but if you can make it worth while, you set up a great field instantly. So long as you had a good grave anyway. With monster reborn being gone I honestly just do not know how more people aren't using soul charge. It's not even all that new anymore! Have you people like... Even tried running it? For more than 1 duel?
So yea. Run soul charge and get over it. As for this wish for it to be banned. Dream on. It's not going anywhere. You can say the cost is t huge all you want but it is. Any time you give your opponent a new turn that's always a huge cost. And unless you use soul charge for Gagaga cowboy, your opponent is getting another turn.
Anyway. Torrential tribute is a card. So is dark hole and solemn. Black horn too. Use these cards to combat soul charge and shut down your opponents plays. One thing you benefit from is that if you can stop a soul charge play you can be fairly confident, a I do say fairly, that they don't have much of any other big play. So take advantage, and turn the odds in your favor on your turn.
| |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Should Charge be Banned? | |
| |
|
| |
| Should Charge be Banned? | |
|